AI literacy, measured.
Across every role in your company.
Role-tailored AI skills assessments. Eight axes across three domains — Execution, Cognitive, Governance. A team spider chart your CHRO can put in front of the board.
For developers, tech leads, ML/AI engineers, and anyone shipping code or AI features.
For SDRs, AEs, AMs, CS managers, support reps — anyone in revenue or post-sale roles.
For executive assistants, ops managers, project managers, and people coordinating work.
What we measure
Eight axes grouped into three domains — Execution, Cognitive, Governance. Calibrated for the way AI fluency actually differentiates strong operators from heavy users.
What you do with AI day-to-day — how cleanly you communicate, which tools you reach for, how deeply AI is woven into your work, and whether you turn one-off use into reusable assets your teammates can adopt.
How clearly you communicate intent, and what context (files, examples, constraints) you put in front of the model.
How well you choose between an inline assistant, a chat, an agent that can run unattended, and combinations of these for the task at hand.
How thoroughly AI is woven into your day-to-day work — and whether the resulting output is good, not just abundant.
Whether your AI work multiplies — reusable prompts, templates, agents, snippets, internal docs that uplift teammates and compound over time.
How you think about AI as a system — recognizing which problems suit AI in the first place, decomposing them well, and rigorously verifying outputs before acting on them.
Whether you can identify which problems are AI-appropriate, decompose ambiguous work, and structure tasks for augmentation rather than replacement.
How well you spot-check individual outputs and — at higher levels — build systematic evals/regressions for repeated AI workflows.
What keeps you and your company safe — handling data correctly when you do use AI, and exercising judgment about when AI is the wrong tool entirely.
How safely you handle data when you do use AI — what you redact, which deployment you choose, what trains on your inputs.
Whether you know when NOT to use AI — when escalation, expert review, or human accountability is non-negotiable, even when AI could produce something plausible.
How it works
Pick a role. Answer 11 questions — multiple-choice, short-form, and one longer scenario — across 8 axes. Designed to feel like a thoughtful coaching session, not a gotcha test.
Per-axis scores, an overall number, and 3 paragraphs of personalized feedback grounded in your actual answers. Shareable result URL.
Subscribe → invite your team via one link → see a team aggregate spider chart with role breakdowns. The artifact your CHRO walks into the board meeting with.
Pricing
- · Individual self-assessment
- · All 3 roles
- · Spider chart + 3-paragraph feedback
- · Shareable result URL
- · Basenull-branded results
- · Up to 25 employees
- · Team dashboard with aggregate spider chart
- · Per-role breakdowns
- · Roster + history
- · Unbranded results
- · CSV export
- · Unlimited employees
- · SAML / SSO
- · Custom roles & axes
- · Audit log
- · Dedicated CSM
- · DPA / BAA available
Why measurement, not training?
Pluralsight, O'Reilly, LinkedIn Learning, Coursera all sell training. Your L&D team needs both — but measurement is the gap. Without it, "AI literacy" on the corporate scorecard is vibes. With it, it's a board-grade artifact you can update quarter-over-quarter.
Why role-tailored?
A sales rep's AI workflow is fundamentally different from a software engineer's. Asking a CS manager about transformer architecture is asking the wrong question. Asking a developer about cold-email frameworks is the wrong question. Each role's assessment is tuned for that workflow.
Why a spider chart?
Eight axes grouped into three domains. Execution (Prompting & Context, Tool & Agent Use, Workflow Integration, Leverage & Reusability) is what you do day-to-day. Cognitive (Problem Framing, Evaluation & Verification) is how you think about AI as a system. Governance (Data Hygiene, Human Judgment) is what keeps you safe. The shape of the chart tells the story before any number does.